A Growing ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: The Way Prosperity and Hardship Now Sit Cheek by Jowl in England.
In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, residents live in homes only a few metres from their more affluent counterparts in the adjacent Scartho. One six-foot-tall wall physically divides the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off paths and streets that previously linked them.
“It’s the divide between rich and poor,” said Serenity Colley, aged 37. “It’s been like this for as long as I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll bring it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Data from government figures shows the extent of disparity often exists, at times across little more than a few metres of tarmac, a line of hedges or a barrier. Decades of austerity and underinvestment mean a majority of councils now contain a neighbourhood ranking as one of the most deprived in the country.
This geographical widening of poverty has led to a significant rise in the quantity of locations where disadvantaged and affluent residents find themselves as immediate neighbours. Just a few years ago, only 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods adjoined one of the wealthiest. This number increased to 119 in the most recent data.
A Barrier Which Divides More Than Land
At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the most pronounced in the UK and painfully apparent. The barrier transcends being just a metaphorical division; it causes tangible difficulties for daily routines.
- School runs that should take a quarter of an hour turn into an hour-long detour.
- Reaching important amenities like supermarkets, educational facilities and care homes is made more difficult.
- The site can attract antisocial behaviour, with reports of rubbish being dumped over the wall and related problems.
“You try to have a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one resident, motioning at the corroded barricade.
Local Bonds Amidst Hardship
At Centre4, staff stress that support transcends addresses. “Your postcode is not a reliable indicator of your level of challenge,” explained chief executive a community leader.
Despite ranking in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe boasts a fierce loyalty and sense of community among its inhabitants. By contrast, the neighbouring area is classified among the most prosperous 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This pattern is repeated across the country. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century housing development, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of areas in the country. It is closely bordered by large detached homes built in the early 2000s that are in the top 10% for job prospects and quality of surroundings.
“They might have larger properties, but here there’s more community,” commented a long-term resident, aged 63. “It’s likely many people in the new builds don’t even speak to each other.”
The financial divide is evident: an typical family home sells for about £275,000 on the estate, while across the divide equivalent homes go for about £410,000.
Residents describe a tangible feeling of neglect. “This part of the community gets ignored,” stated resident Susan. “Over here our facilities have slowly been taken away, and the majority of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.”
The increase in these ‘deprivation divides’ paints a portrait of an ever more segregated society, where prosperity and need are often awkwardly close neighbours.