🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.