🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a growing group of nations are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". A law could be passed next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to enact a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," commented one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any action must be "grounded in robust research".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. However, the government committed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. An organization founded by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to harmful platform posts contends that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional access requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some individuals to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of the West, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, world agencies adopt a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this global discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that states around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.